Here now is my second post on that intriguing little article by Louis Markos in the journal First Things, which he entitled “Errant Ehrman.” If you’ll recall from my last post, Markos starts the article by indicating that he felt “great pity” for me because I was the wrong kind of fundamentalist back when I was a conservative Christian. My problem, he indicates, is that I applied modern standards to decide whether the Bible was inerrant. Here are his words: He [Ehrman] was taught, rightly, that there are no contradictions in the Bible, but he was trained, quite falsely, to interpret the non-contradictory nature of the Bible in modern, scientific, post-Enlightenment terms. That is to say, he was encouraged to test the truth of the Bible against a verification system that has only existed for some 250 years….. Read by Petra Ortiz
Part one of two posts about the Phibionites, a group of heretical early Christians with (allegedly) extreme sexual liturgies. Read by Brandon M. Bender
Bart presents views of Gerd Lüdemann that emphasize Peter's vision as the origin of the story of the resurrection. Read by John Paul Middlesworth
Part of a prospectus for "The Invention of Charity," Bart's next book project. Read by Brandon M. Bender