I have been talking about Paul’s knowledge of the historical Jesus, and yesterday began a discussion of what Paul clearly knew about Jesus’ teachings. That’s where I will pick up here. Again, I have taken the discussion from my book Did Jesus Exist?, so the orientation of what I have to say is toward showing that Paul provides solid (and for my mind, virtually incontrovertible) evidence that Jesus was not simply “made up” but was an actual historical figure – an issue that, for most people in the universe of intelligent humans, is not much of an issue, but which is disputed by that tiny yet oh-so-vocal group of “mythicists” about which I have said some things before. In any event, there are a few more interesting aspects of the question of Paul’s use of Jesus’ teachings, as follows: Read by Petra Ortiz
Paul is a dominant figure in the New Testament, with over half of the New Testament books connected to him in some way, with...
Paul frequently pointed out the hardships he suffered to deliver the gospel to the Gentiles -- but we've only been given his side of...
Dr. Ehrman puts Revelation in its historical context by considering who the author is and what weighed upon his audience Read by John Paul...