In my last post I pointed out that the famous passage of the so-called “bloody sweat” in Luke 22:43-44 is thought by some scholars not to have been original to the Gospel of Luke. I count myself in that number. One of my very first scholarly articles was devoted to the question; I wrote it when I was a first-year graduate student – or rather, I co-wrote it, with a friend of mine who was in the PhD program at Princeton Seminary with me, a fellow named Mark Plunkett. Mark had done a study of the passage of Jesus’ prayer before his arrest and had realized something about the structure of the passage, which made me, in turn, realize, that if he was right, then the two verses about the bloody sweat could not have been original to the passage. Read by Petra Ortiz
Bart shows how Paul's Thessalonian audience would have understood what fundamentalists call "the rapture." Read by John Paul Middlesworth.
A preview of the upcoming debate on Paths in Biblical Studies between John Kloppenborg, who does, and Mark Goodacre, who doesn't, believe in the...