In my last post I pointed out that the famous passage of the so-called “bloody sweat” in Luke 22:43-44 is thought by some scholars not to have been original to the Gospel of Luke. I count myself in that number. One of my very first scholarly articles was devoted to the question; I wrote it when I was a first-year graduate student – or rather, I co-wrote it, with a friend of mine who was in the PhD program at Princeton Seminary with me, a fellow named Mark Plunkett. Mark had done a study of the passage of Jesus’ prayer before his arrest and had realized something about the structure of the passage, which made me, in turn, realize, that if he was right, then the two verses about the bloody sweat could not have been original to the passage. Read by Petra Ortiz
Bart outlines the issues about what people conventionally believe about the Nativity. Read by John Paul Middlesworth .
Dr. Ehrman argues that a scribe inserted parts of Luke's account of the Last Supper. Read by John Paul Middlesworth
Dr. Ehrman presents the opening section of The Gospel of Nicodemus, followed by the scene of the Roman standards bowing down to Jesus.