In my last post I pointed out that the famous passage of the so-called “bloody sweat” in Luke 22:43-44 is thought by some scholars not to have been original to the Gospel of Luke. I count myself in that number. One of my very first scholarly articles was devoted to the question; I wrote it when I was a first-year graduate student – or rather, I co-wrote it, with a friend of mine who was in the PhD program at Princeton Seminary with me, a fellow named Mark Plunkett. Mark had done a study of the passage of Jesus’ prayer before his arrest and had realized something about the structure of the passage, which made me, in turn, realize, that if he was right, then the two verses about the bloody sweat could not have been original to the passage. Read by Petra Ortiz
                        
                    Bart starts to look at The Book of the Watchers, the first part of 1 Enoch, the apocryphal work cited by Jude in the...
                        
                    My previous post was an interview with Sam Devis for his podcast "When Belief Dies." Sam is an active volunteer on the blog and...
                        
                    Bart shows that many of the things we believe about the nativity come from the Proto-Gospel of James. Read by John Paul Middlesworth.