In my last post I started giving the principal options, as I see them, for why Paul did not mention more about the historical Jesus. Below are two other leading options. As I’ve indicated, there are probably others, and if some occur to you, feel free to comment! Read by Petra Ortiz
Bart points out that Matthew and Luke did not consider Mark to be an inviolable, sacrosanct, completely accurate account of what Jesus said and...
Bart discusses the authorship of the Pastoral Epistles and the pain threshold of early Christian martyrs. Read by John Paul Middlesworth.
Bart explains why it's much more likely that the writers of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were copying each other than that they just happened...