In my last post I started giving the principal options, as I see them, for why Paul did not mention more about the historical Jesus. Below are two other leading options. As I’ve indicated, there are probably others, and if some occur to you, feel free to comment! Read by Petra Ortiz
Dr. Ehrman uses a post from 2015 to point out that were an alleged "1st-century Mark" to be verified, it would change little about...
Bart wonders why evangelical scholars would be so bound and determined to get their hands on a first-century copy of Mark. Read by John...
Read by Sharon Roberts.