I have explained why it is almost certain that Luke did not himself write the passage describing Jesus “sweating blood” in Luke 22:43-44; the passage is not found in some of our oldest and best manuscripts, it intrudes in a context that otherwise is structured as a clear chiasmus, and it presents a view of Jesus going to his death precisely at odds with what Luke has produced otherwise. Whereas Luke goes out of his way to portray Jesus as calm and in control in the ace of death – evidently to provide a model to his readers about how they too suffer when they experience persecution – these verses show him in deep anguish to the point of needing heavenly support by an angel, as he sweats great drops as of blood. But if the verses were not originally in Luke, why were they added by scribes? Read by Petra Ortiz
In a guest post, Marc Brettler addresses the "pernicious attitude" of those who insist on a dichotomy of a wrathful God in the OT...
Even though, Luke, seems to endorse a view of atonement, he probably doesn't. Read by Sharon Roberts
The apocryphal 3 Corinthians, Bart argues, is a forgery written to oppose forgeries. Read by John Paul Middlesworth.